Please read and respect our posting rules
Rule #5. Suggesting or encouraging any illegal activity is cause for immediate deletion and suspension of posting privileges. You can share information on what is legal, and what is not legal, but our forums are not a place to seek, or offer help, on how to break the law.



Other Related Topics >> Laws, Regulations, and Enforcement

Pages: 1
PrivateRealm
Threadhead


Reged: 03/18/03
Posts: 879
Loc: usa
"Sources"
      #88380 - 07/18/03 02:55 AM

Is it just me, or has "Source" become the politically correct term for a DRUG DEALER?

--------------------
KeriAnne~~~
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take - but by the moments that take our breath away."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Billyl
Board Addict


Reged: 06/14/02
Posts: 389
Loc: NorthEast
Re: "Sources" [Re: PrivateRealm]
      #88483 - 07/18/03 04:04 PM

I happen to agree. Source=Drug dealer. Take care. Billylll

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Anonymous
Unregistered




Re: "Sources" [Re: Billyl]
      #88517 - 07/18/03 08:26 PM

Quote:

I happen to agree. Source=Drug dealer. Take care. Billylll




Come on guys, get real -- this whole OP area is gray market and you all know it. And since when is mental/emotional pain less valid than physical pain. Stop worrying about PC and worry about the real issue, which is that we live in a culture that has been propagandized into believing that drugs are evil, while at the same time the big pharmas cover the airwaves with ads for expensive drugs to cure toenail fungus etc. Incongruent is the word. Follow the money.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PrivateRealm
Threadhead


Reged: 03/18/03
Posts: 879
Loc: usa
Re: "Sources" [Re: plotinus]
      #88548 - 07/19/03 12:20 AM

I am not talking about OP's at all-International or US, as I use USOP's, and have used IOP's. I am mainly talking about all the debates over E-mail sources, and peop;e spending many hundreds, and even thousands of dollars on the chance that they might recieve their products.

--------------------
KeriAnne~~~
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take - but by the moments that take our breath away."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
qbird
material girl


Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 826
Loc: USA
Re: "Sources" [Re: PrivateRealm]
      #88660 - 07/19/03 04:11 PM

When I read your post I hesitated to say anything because I did not understand in what context do you mean. If this board stood for something totally illegal, I don't think it would be here long and we would hear of a lot of arrest stories. In the context that you are asking taking a chance on an e-mail source for hard to get drugs. Source=Drug dealer, yep. It is hard to believe that some people throw away money on a chance that someone will send the oxy. for example. That certainly is not very smart.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Daycamp72
Enthusiast


Reged: 06/29/02
Posts: 283
Loc: Tara
Re: "Sources" [Re: qbird]
      #88661 - 07/19/03 04:16 PM

If I had the guts (which I don't), and I was a fool (which I ain't) and I wanted to make several millions of dollars (which I don't), I would open up my own OP.
Yes, friends, money makes this old world go 'round.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Billyl
Board Addict


Reged: 06/14/02
Posts: 389
Loc: NorthEast
Re: "Sources" [Re: plotinus]
      #88704 - 07/19/03 08:49 PM

I am real. Obtaining scheduled medications from a person, not a medical proffesional via e-mail, is the same as going to a street corner and buying it through your car window.
You would be subject to the same arrest and sting operations that result from one's lack of common sense.
Take care. Billylll


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
zorg
Veteran


Reged: 04/29/02
Posts: 559
Loc: Midwest
Re: "Sources" [Re: plotinus]
      #88712 - 07/19/03 09:20 PM

Honestly I don't think the OP's are operating very far into any dangerous territory at all. Well, the OP's that require records and speak longer than 15 seconds that is; the others that don't, will be the first to fall. The longer-lasting OP's all require tangible records, and the doctor speaks at-length with the potential patient, all the while weighing his license status against patient rationale for opioid medication. As usual I back Billy on this, and one very important thing to remember is that as the various mindsets here clash, is that myself, and I betcha Billy too, ultimately believe we should have sole authority over what we ingest into our own bodies. The reason things become heated and contentious now is because there ARE laws on the book that don't give a hoot about pie-in-the-sky scenarios, they will be enforced at some point, on someone! Many of us that bicker back and forth actually share more in common that most other people, a tie that binds. I only mind recreational users right now because of legal repercussions that may affect me or other people who have been to the brink with this suffering. That's right... if you're a recreational OP user, you are endangering ME! BUT, I still want you to have that right ultimately, just not in a way that screws me over right now, given the sh1tty laws we have. If you strip away the laws on the books right now, you wouldn't see much bickering here anymore.... I don't think any of us feel we have "moral authority" over anyone else..... we are actually the most downtrodden, either recreational or medicinal! Both camps are equally loathed by the healthy, happy, Reebok-wearing Golds-Gym-going Treadmill-wheezing Seven-habits-of-highly-effective-people-reading capital hill gang, so here we are.

Listen to Billy, he may just save your hide one day. He knows wtf he's talking about, and he is a champion for the suffering who's lives in some cases hang by a thread of relief.

Have a pain-diminished day everyone, no matter your intents, I wish you all well. Don't forget this is still one of the best-behaved boards on the net, so don't get down about arguments we have time to time. You woulnd't believe the drama that goes on elsewhere.

Bi-directional respect and behavior will keep us together.

J


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
samisu
Member


Reged: 02/08/03
Posts: 158
Loc: Tennessee
Re: "Sources" [Re: zorg]
      #88720 - 07/19/03 10:46 PM

Great post Sonic. Thanks for so freely expressing your opinions and not being judgemental. I totally agree with you and with Billy that we all stand to lose in the never-ending battle to obtain the meds we need to obtain relief and to not adhere to the laws while doing this puts us all in danger of losing perhaps the best thing that we have for ourselves. I really appreciate everyone's input on this very controversial subject and am glad that DB allows us the freedom to come here and debate the subject while respecting the rights of our fellow members.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
qbird
material girl


Reged: 09/02/02
Posts: 826
Loc: USA
Re: "Sources" [Re: Daycamp72]
      #88923 - 07/21/03 07:41 AM

I want to make millions of dollars. But since I don't want to get busted and I am not a scam artist, the email thing is a no go.

I once again totally agree with Sonick. He says things so well. I think the US OPs that require records and will call you are OK for now. The IOPs are really not working in a grey area as is the email sources. Look at DEA rules and regs, it is spelled out there. That would be like going to the corner and scoring some. I have a family and would not even consider this if I felt I was in any danger of being busted.



Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
4 registered and 5 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Heidi, Melody 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 814

Rate this topic

Jump to

Help & Contact Information | Privacy statement | Rules Free Members Area

*
UBB.threads™ 6.5
With Modifications from ThreadsDev.com by Joshua Pettit