NYCchick
Member

Reged: 06/18/04
Posts: 155
Loc: NYC
|
|
I read an interesting article in the Sunday NY Times yesterday and thought I'd share. Could also be a big part of why people aren't getting the medications they need or those that work.
As Doctors Write Prescriptions, Drug Companies Write Checks
By GARDINER HARRIS
Published: June 27, 2004
The check for $10,000 arrived in the mail unsolicited. The doctor who received it from the drug maker Schering-Plough said it was made out to him personally in exchange for an attached "consulting" agreement that required nothing other than his commitment to prescribe the company's medicines. Two other physicians said in separate interviews that they, too, received checks unbidden from Schering-Plough, one of the world's biggest drug companies.
"I threw mine away," said the first doctor, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of concern about being drawn into a federal inquiry into the matter.
Those checks and others, some of them said to be for six-figure sums, are under investigation by federal prosecutors in Boston as part of a broad government crackdown on the drug industry's marketing tactics. Just about every big global drug company including Johnson & Johnson, Wyeth and Bristol-Myers Squibb has disclosed in securities filings that it has received a federal subpoena, and most are juggling subpoenas stemming from several investigations.
The details of the Schering-Plough tactics, gleaned from interviews with 20 doctors, as well as industry executives and people close to the investigation, shed light on the shadowy system of financial lures that pharmaceutical companies have used to persuade physicians to favor their drugs.
Schering-Plough's tactics, these people said, included paying doctors large sums to prescribe its drug for hepatitis C and to take part in company-sponsored clinical trials that were little more than thinly disguised marketing efforts that required little effort on the doctors' part. Doctors who demonstrated disloyalty by testing other company's drugs, or even talking favorably about them, risked being barred from the Schering-Plough money stream.
Schering-Plough says that the activities under investigation occurred before its new chief executive, Fred Hassan, arrived in April 2003, and that it has overhauled its marketing to eliminate inducements.
At the heart of the various investigations into drug industry marketing is the question of whether drug companies are persuading doctors often through payoffs to prescribe drugs that patients do not need or should not use or for which there may be cheaper alternatives. Investigators are also seeking to determine whether the companies are manipulating prices to cheat the federal Medicaid and Medicare health programs. Most of the big drug companies, meanwhile, are also grappling with a welter of suits filed by state attorneys general, industry whistle-blowers and patient-rights groups over similar accusations.
In many ways, the investigations are a response to the evolution of the pharmaceutical business, which has grown in the last quarter-century from a small group of companies peddling a few antibiotics and antianxiety remedies to a $400 billion behemoth.
--------------------
'Like' the modern day comma.
Edited by NYCchick (06/28/04 09:11 AM)
|
Sweetz
Diamond Mind

Reged: 05/11/02
Posts: 768
Loc: Texas!
|
|
Doesn't surprise me a bit. I bet that Neurontin was a med that was marketed in this manner a few years ago. Now, there's a lawsuit against the makers because it didn't do all they said it would.
It's just a shame it works this way, but I'm sure it does for some docs.
--------------------
"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice."
|
Lablady2
Old Hand
Reged: 05/05/04
Posts: 483
Loc: New York City
|
|
As someone who worked in pharmaceuticals before switching to education, let me tell you that all that the above poster(s) said is true. I have seen clinical studies done backwards - that is making patient data fit the stats for an NDA (new drug application) to FDA, I have seen contests run whereby the MD who prescribes the most "whatever" gets a free vacation for him/herself and siginifcant other to Tahiti or Pago Pago, I have seen criminal manipulation of statistics re NDA's, in short I have seen it all. There is also the "revolving door" between the pharmaceutical companies and the FDA!
I also have a relative who was prescribed Neurontin after a back operation who had a grand mal seizure from it.
The pharmaceutical lobby in DC is HUGE - and the government is in it's hip pocket. Why do you think prices of Rx drugs are sky high in this country - why do you think MD's are scared to death of DEA re prescribing pain medication - it's all about keeping the status quo and feeding the greedy pharmaceutical companies who keep screaming the high cost of R&D - my backside - its the humongous cost re the perks offered to the officers of these greedy corporations. corporatiions!!!!!!!!!!!
|
IMSUSCOT1
Threadhead
Reged: 10/23/02
Posts: 919
Loc: usa
|
|
Yeah, I remember being prescribed obscene amounts of Neurontin for pain management...and it did nothing for it....I finally refused to take it any more....course I was prescribed nearly 10 different drugs, none of them narcotics and none of them effective....and found out the doctor who told me he didn't believe in narcotics, I found out later couldn't prescribe...as he just finished a six month in patient stay at a rehab hospital for an addiction to xanax and had his license impinged....great
|
Lablady2
Old Hand
Reged: 05/05/04
Posts: 483
Loc: New York City
|
|
Doesn't surprise me one bit! I use only IOP's - have an order in now - is kind of late also - hope my buddies at customs haven't gotten hold of it:)
|
PIGINPAIN
Journeyman
Reged: 06/10/04
Posts: 85
|
|
IMSUSCOT1- Sounds like you and I had the same doc... Mine kept talking about how "nature" would cure the pain from my fractured back. I flat out asked him if his license was restricted or suspended and he turned beet red. He admitted that he had lost his DEA license for a "misunderstanding" and would have it back in a year. I told him to call me in a year, left the office, and put a stop payment on the check.
A doc without a license to prescribe is like going to a mechanic who had his tools taken away. Diagnosis may be great, but they can't do a thing about it.
PS. Post # 50, no more "NEWBIE" 
|