Ermeds


DrugBuyers.com VIP Members get $20 off the consultation.

The doctor may qualify you for 120 count and up to two refills on your order. Join Now



Other Related Topics >> Laws, Regulations, and Enforcement

Pages: 1
NJ_Hoss
Enthusiast


Reged: 10/29/03
Posts: 263
Loc: USA
Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative
      #148941 - 03/19/04 10:27 AM

By Susan Heavey

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. lawmakers are pushing for legislation to rein in the growing number of Internet pharmacies filling drug orders from patients who may have never seen a doctor.

"Too many people are finding ways to obtain medications online without valid prescriptions," U.S. House of Representatives Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Tom Davis said at a hearing on Thursday.

More than 1,000 U.S. Web sites offer prescription drugs without requiring proper documentation, U.S. Food and Drug Administration officials testified.

Some sites employ physicians to talk with patients on the phone before writing a prescription, usually for a fee based on the number written. Others require no prescription at all.

Sites can also ask patients to fill out a questionnaire about their symptoms and medical history, but those are often ignored, said FDA Associate Commissioner William Hubbard.

Tracking down rogue sites, however, can be difficult.

In one example, Hubbard said FDA officials bought several prescription drugs from what looked like a China-based Web site. The package arrived with a return address in Miami, a postmark from Texas and a reorder form to be sent to an overseas address in Belize.

"This site has so many convoluted potential sources, we don't know where it is," Hubbard said.

A bill introduced by Davis, a Virginia Republican, would force Web sites to clearly identify their doctors and pharmacists as well as their contact information.

The Internet Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act would also require face-to-face meetings between patients and doctors.

Although states regulate prescriptions, Web sites based in one state and selling to patients in another can cause enforcement headaches, legislators said.

"A Web site operator can be in one state, the pharmacy in a second state and the prescribing physician in a third state," said Ranking Minority Member Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat from California who co-sponsored the bill.

Under the legislation, states could take a Web pharmacy to federal court, even if that site is based in another state.

Because the bill would only affect U.S.-based Internet pharmacies, it would not impact patients who buy drugs from Web sites based in other countries.


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
FooGoo
Stranger


Reged: 07/22/03
Posts: 19
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #148975 - 03/19/04 01:10 PM

*sigh*
just throw it on the pile of other bills that will make our lifes more miserable

--------------------
to live, to love, to experience life without pain


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carrigaline
Journeyman


Reged: 01/22/03
Posts: 82
Loc: So Cal
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #148992 - 03/19/04 02:21 PM

In case anyone wants to read the actual bill which was presented in the House yesterday, it is HB 3880. You can access the bill by typing: thomas.loc.gov Then click on the site Thomas: Legislative Information on the Internet. This will bring up a page with all sorts of Legislative info. There's a box where you type in the bill number HB 3880 (you have to include the HB not just the number) and you can read the bill in its entirety.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
carrigaline
Journeyman


Reged: 01/22/03
Posts: 82
Loc: So Cal
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: carrigaline]
      #148998 - 03/19/04 02:32 PM

Correction: The bill was introduced March 3, 2004 - not yesterday as I stated in my earlier post.

Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
debby
Journeyman


Reged: 11/17/03
Posts: 76
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #149001 - 03/19/04 02:39 PM


Thanks for posting this NJ Hoss, I agree with FooGoo, and btw N J Hoss, I have missed your posts..welcome back.
debby


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
DrugBuyersAdministrator
Administrator


Reged: 11/18/01
Posts: 1226
Loc: DrugBuyers.Com
Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #149300 - 03/20/04 09:58 PM

Thank you for posting that very interesting article.

This is the text of the proposed amendment:

Quote:

108th CONGRESS
2d Session



H. R. 3880


To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the sale of prescription drugs through the Internet.


IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

March 3, 2004
Mr. TOM DAVIS of Virginia (for himself and Mr. WAXMAN) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


A BILL
To amend the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act with respect to the sale of prescription drugs through the Internet.


Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Internet Pharmacy Consumer Protection Act'.

SEC. 2. INTERNET SALES OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

(a) In General- Chapter 5 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 351 et seq.) is amended by inserting after section 503A the following section:

`SEC. 503B. INTERNET SALES OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS.

`(a) Requirements Regarding Information on Internet Site-

`(1) In general- A person may not dispense a prescription drug pursuant to a sale of the drug by such person if--

`(A) the purchaser of the drug submitted the purchase order for the drug, or conducted any other part of the sales transaction for the drug, through an Internet site; and

`(B) such site, or any other Internet site used by such person for purposes of sales of a prescription drug, fails to meet each of the requirements specified in paragraph (2) (other than a site or pages on a site that are not intended to be accessed by purchasers or prospective purchasers or that provide an Internet information location tool within the meaning of section 231(e)(5) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 231(e)(5)).

`(2) Requirements- With respect to an Internet site, the requirements referred to in subparagraph (B) of paragraph (1) for a person to whom such paragraph applies are as follows:

`(A) Each page of the site shall include either the following information or a link to a page that provides the following information:

`(i) The name of such person; the address of the principal place of business of the person with respect to sales of prescription drugs through the Internet; and the telephone number for such place of business.

`(ii) Each State in which the person is authorized by law to dispense prescription drugs.

`(iii) The name of each individual who serves as a pharmacist for purposes of the site, and each State in which the individual is authorized by law to dispense prescription drugs.

`(iv) If the person provides for medical consultations through the site for purposes of providing prescriptions, the name of each individual who provides such consultations; each State in which the individual is licensed or otherwise authorized by law to provide such consultations or practice medicine; and the type or types of health professions for which the individual holds such licenses or other authorizations.

`(B) A link to which paragraph (1) applies shall be displayed in a clear and prominent place and manner, and shall include in the caption for the link the words `licensing and contact information'.

`(b) Internet Sales Without Appropriate Medical Relationships-

`(1) In general- A person may not dispense a prescription drug, or sell such a drug, if--

`(A) for purposes of such dispensing or sale, the purchaser communicated with the person through the Internet;

`(B) the patient for whom the drug was dispensed or purchased did not, when such communications began, have a prescription for the drug that is valid in the United States;

`(C) pursuant to such communications, the person provided for the involvement of a practitioner, or an individual represented by the person as a practitioner, and the practitioner or such individual issued a prescription for the drug that was purchased;

`(D) the person knew, or had reason to know, that the practitioner or the individual referred to in subparagraph (C) did not, when issuing the prescription, have a qualifying medical relationship with the patient; and

`(E) the person received payment for the dispensing or sale of the drug.

For purposes of subparagraph (E), payment is received if money or other other valuable consideration is received.

`(2) Qualifying medical relationship-

`(A) In general- With respect to issuing a prescription for a drug for a patient, a practitioner has a qualifying medical relationship with the patient for purposes of this section if at least one in-person medical evaluation of the patient has been conducted by the practitioner.

`(B) In-person medical evaluation- A medical evaluation by a practitioner is an in-person medical evaluation for purposes of this section if the practitioner is in the physical presence of the patient as part of conducting the evaluation, without regard to whether portions of the evaluation are conducted by other health professionals.

`(3) Rules of construction-

`(A) Individuals represented as practitioners- A person who is not a practitioner (as defined in subsection (d)(2)) lacks legal capacity under this section to have a qualifying medical relationship with any patient.

`(B) Applicability of requirements- Paragraph (1) may not be construed as having any applicability beyond this section, and does not affect any State law, or interpretation of State law, concerning the practice of medicine.

`(C) Standard practice of pharmacy- Paragraph (1) may not be construed as prohibiting any conduct that is a standard practice in the practice of pharmacy.

`(c) Actions by States-

`(1) In general- Whenever an attorney general of any State has reason to believe that the interests of the residents of that State have been or are being threatened or adversely affected because any person has engaged or is engaging in a pattern or practice that violates section 301(l), the State may bring a civil action on behalf of its residents in an appropriate district court of the United States to enjoin such practice, to enforce compliance with such section (including a nationwide injunction), to obtain damages, restitution, or other compensation on behalf of residents of such State, to obtain reasonable attorneys fees and costs if the State prevails in the civil action, or to obtain such further and other relief as the court may deem appropriate.

`(2) Notice- The State shall serve prior written notice of any civil action under paragraph (1) or (5)(B) upon the Secretary and provide the Secretary with a copy of its complaint, except that if it is not feasible for the State to provide such prior notice, the State shall serve such notice immediately upon instituting such action. Upon receiving a notice respecting a civil action, the Secretary shall have the right--

`(A) to intervene in such action;

`(B) upon so intervening, to be heard on all matters arising therein; and

`(C) to file petitions for appeal.

`(3) Construction- For purposes of bringing any civil action under paragraph (1), nothing in this chapter shall prevent an attorney general of a State from exercising the powers conferred on the attorney general by the laws of such State to conduct investigations or to administer oaths or affirmations or to compel the attendance of witnesses or the production of documentary and other evidence.

`(4) Venue; service of process- Any civil action brought under paragraph (1) in a district court of the United States may be brought in the district in which the defendant is found, is an inhabitant, or transacts business or wherever venue is proper under section 1391 of title 28, United States Code. Process in such an action may be served in any district in which the defendant is an inhabitant or in which the defendant may be found.

`(5) Actions by other state officials-

`(A) Nothing contained in this section shall prohibit an authorized State official from proceeding in State court on the basis of an alleged violation of any civil or criminal statute of such State.

`(B) In addition to actions brought by an attorney general of a State under paragraph (1), such an action may be brought by officers of such State who are authorized by the State to bring actions in such State on behalf of its residents.

`(d) Definitions-

`(1) Internet-related definitions- For purposes of this section:

`(A) The term `Internet' means collectively the myriad of computer and telecommunications facilities, including equipment and operating software, which comprise the interconnected world-wide network of networks that employ the transmission control protocol/internet protocol, or any predecessor or successor protocols to such protocol, to communicate information of all kinds by wire or radio.

`(B) The term `link', with respect to the Internet, means one or more letters, words, numbers, symbols, or graphic items that appear on a page of an Internet site for the purpose of serving, when activated, as a method for executing an electronic command--

`(i) to move from viewing one portion of a page on such site to another portion of the page;

`(ii) to move from viewing one page on such site to another page on such site; or

`(iii) to move from viewing a page on one Internet site to a page on another Internet site.

`(C) The term `page', with respect to the Internet, means a document or other file accessed at an Internet site.

`(D)(i) The terms `site' and `address', with respect to the Internet, mean a specific location on the Internet that is determined by Internet Protocol numbers. Such term includes the domain name, if any.

`(ii) The term `domain name' means a method of representing an Internet address without direct reference to the Internet Protocol numbers for the address, including methods that use designations such as `.com', `.edu', `.gov', `.net', or `.org'.

`(iii) The term `Internet Protocol numbers' includes any successor protocol for determining a specific location on the Internet.

`(2) Other definitions- For purposes of this section:

`(A) The term `practitioner' means a practitioner referred to in section 503(b)(1) with respect to issuing a written or oral prescription.

`(B) The term `prescription drug' means a drug that is subject to section 503(b)(1).

`(C) The term `qualifying medical relationship', with respect to a practitioner and a patient, has the meaning indicated for such term in subsection (b).

`(e) Interactive Computer Service; Advertising- No provider of an interactive computer service, as defined in section 230(f)(2) of the Communications Act of 1934 (47 U.S.C. 230(f)(2)), or of advertising services shall be liable under this section for dispensing or selling prescription drugs in violation of this section on account of another person's selling or dispensing such drugs, provided that the provider of the interactive computer service or of advertising services does not own or exercise corporate control over such person.'.

(b) Inclusion as Prohibited Act- Section 301 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 331) is amended by inserting after paragraph (k) the following:

`(l) The dispensing or selling of a prescription drug in violation of section 503B.'.

(c) Internet Sales of Prescription Drugs; Consideration by Secretary of Practices and Procedures for Certification of Legitimate Businesses- In carrying out section 503B of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (as added by subsection (a) of this section), the Secretary of Health and Human Services shall take into consideration the practices and procedures of public or private entities that certify that businesses selling prescription drugs through Internet sites are legitimate businesses, including practices and procedures regarding disclosure formats and verification programs.

(d) Effective Date- The amendments made by subsections (a) and (b) take effect upon the expiration of the 60-day period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, without regard to whether a final rule to implement such amendments has been promulgated by the Secretary of Health and Human Services under section 701(a) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act. The preceding sentence may not be construed as affecting the authority of such Secretary to promulgate such a final rule.

SEC. 3. REPORTS REGARDING INTERNET-RELATED VIOLATIONS OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS ON DISPENSING OF DRUGS.

(a) In General- The Secretary of Health and Human Services (referred to in this section as the `Secretary') shall, pursuant to the submission of an application meeting the criteria of the Secretary, make an award of a grant or contract to the National Clearinghouse on Internet Prescribing (operated by the Federation of State Medical Boards) for the purpose of--

(1) identifying Internet sites that appear to be in violation of State or Federal laws concerning the dispensing of drugs;

(2) reporting such sites to State medical licensing boards and State pharmacy licensing boards, and to the Attorney General and the Secretary, for further investigation; and

(3) submitting, for each fiscal year for which the award under this subsection is made, a report to the Secretary describing investigations undertaken with respect to violations described in paragraph (1).

(b) Authorization of Appropriations- For the purpose of carrying out subsection (a), there is authorized to be appropriated $100,000 for each of the fiscal years 2004 through 2006.
END






--------------------
"Whosoever is spared personal pain must feel himself called to help in diminishing the pain of others." Dr Albert Schweitzer


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
turcica
seeker


Reged: 12/21/03
Posts: 312
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #149309 - 03/20/04 10:46 PM

Thank you so much for the post. By the way, I am so glad to see your George Clooney, stars avi and of course your posts back. You sure were missed and not just by me. Welcome back, and keep posting. turcica

--------------------
turcica
The only failure is not knowing how to be happy
-------------------------------------------------


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
tray1
Enthusiast


Reged: 11/22/03
Posts: 241
Loc: US
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: turcica]
      #149314 - 03/20/04 11:10 PM

Yes, welcome back Hoss, you were sorely missed!

Tray


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
PrivateRealm
Threadhead


Reged: 03/18/03
Posts: 879
Loc: usa
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: NJ_Hoss]
      #149328 - 03/21/04 02:34 AM

OK, so how is this exactly going to effect us, and will it be likely to pass?

--------------------
KeriAnne~~~
"Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take - but by the moments that take our breath away."


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
henry1
Enthusiast


Reged: 10/08/03
Posts: 281
Loc: North Central USA
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: PrivateRealm]
      #149370 - 03/21/04 07:48 AM

If I'm reading it correctly, a patient would have to meet face to face with the person prescribing the medication. Thats just one small part of it. Its a death notice for OPs.

--------------------
treading the backward path...


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
LumbarSpasm
Silent Chaos


Reged: 05/07/02
Posts: 1538
Loc: USA
Re: Internet Pharmacy Federal Legislation Initiative [Re: henry1]
      #149457 - 03/21/04 04:26 PM

Quote:

If I'm reading it correctly, a patient would have to meet face to face with the person prescribing the medication. Thats just one small part of it. Its a death notice for OPs.




Yes, or maybe it is time to travel to one of our good docs.
That is not practical nor can many of us bear the expense, but I see it has an alternative way to continue and strenghten a good relationship.

If the docs could travel a bit themselves to major cities it could end up as a win/win situation after the logistical nightmare of scheduling was over.

--------------------
LumbarSpasm
Or just a pain in the butt?!


Post Extras: Print Post   Remind Me!   Notify Moderator  
Pages: 1



Extra information
1 registered and 3 anonymous users are browsing this forum.

Moderator:  Heidi, Melody 

Print Topic

Forum Permissions
      You cannot start new topics
      You cannot reply to topics
      HTML is enabled
      UBBCode is enabled

Rating:
Topic views: 642

Rate this topic

Jump to

Help & Contact Information | Privacy statement | Rules Free Members Area

*
UBB.threads™ 6.5
With Modifications from ThreadsDev.com by Joshua Pettit