| Trampy |
| (Pooh-Bah) |
| 02/29/04 11:03 PM |
 Re: Busted in a huge way! WARNING TO YOU ALL, PLS
|
Quote:
My opinion on these posts is that it is always the same situation. A poster who doesn't post often drops a bomb and then never or rarely comes back with any info to add of any value. Now, if it were due to the fact that they wanted to keep some sort of annonymity then why would they post the "i got busted" thread to start with. Curious to me that it is always the same sort of thing.
The second part is that we all know it is dicey to order from IOP's and that the only time these things happen is when it is someone recieving meds from an IOP yet, when people "get busted" which I am curious about, (not calling anyone a liar, just saying) they act like nobody knew.
Here we go again ...
Well, SHE didn't know it could lead to an arrest. Go read her posts. She apparently believed the many people here advising that seizure notices should be ignored. She posted about her arrest because she thought she was doing something to help you all: "WARNING TO YOU ALL, PLS."
But ... contrary to the "accident gawkers" hopes, she didn't come back to post anything that could identify her case sufficiently to give LE probable cause to get a subpeona or warrant for DB's server logs to track it down to an IP, which may or may not be a public-access computer and may or may not be from the same ISP as the prior posts. We don't know and neither would LE. Her one warning is not enough cause to trace the IPs. Only DB can look up the IPs of her posts to see where they came from.
As it is, there's no probable cause to get that information from DB ... so it's not a confession because even if they did have the posts and suspected they came from her, they can't prove they came from her computer (unless they're still in her computer's cache) so they would be inadmissible in court.
If she had come back to give details and the posts were all traced back to her computer, then they could use the previous posts as evidence of receiving prior orders of Neurofen and ignoring multiple seizure notices. Read the way they phrase the drug laws. KNOWINGLY AND WILLINGLY is something you'll see over and over again. Honest ignorance of the law is technically not a valid defense, but it can lead to jury nullification and a hung jury if there is just one juror who believes the person should not be convicted ... if that juror doesn't tell anyone the real reason why they held out for acquittal. For a small amount, i really doubt they'd have a second trial ... or even a first trial. Almost all of these cases get dismissed or pled out.
Most people are very naive about legal matters. Just look at all the searches that people consent to and then go to prison for ... when they could have been going on their merry way if they knew their rights. It's like math anxiety or not being able to file your taxes. Mention a law and some people just can't think about it. Sure ... the OP's web site said it's legal to import a 90-day supply. Yeah, right ... "legend drugs" (that is, not controlled substances), which are not sold in the U.S., and are purchased on the advice of a physician -- that's what the AIDS activist organization, Act Up, got the FDA to do in issuing the 1988 Pilot Guidance. How many here knew where that came from?
Trampy
